Tuesday, January 31, 2006
REQUIRED READING!
(This wonderful essay by R.C. Sproul is right on target and is worthy of a careful reading.)
Augustine and Pelagius, by R.C. Sproul
"It is Augustine who gave us the Reformation." So wrote B. B. Warfield in his assessment of the influence of Augustine on church history. It is not only that Luther was an Augustinian monk, or that Calvin quoted Augustine more than any other theologian that provoked Warfield's remark. Rather, it was that the Reformation witnessed the ultimate triumph of Augustine's doctrine of grace over the legacy of the Pelagian view of man.
Humanism, in all its subtle forms, recapitulates the unvarnished Pelagianism against which Augustine struggled. Though Pelagius was condemned as a heretic by Rome, and its modified form, Semi-Pelagianism was likewise condemned by the Council of Orange in 529, the basic assumptions of this view persisted throughout church history to reappear in Medieval Catholicism, Renaissance Humanism, Socinianism, Arminianism, and modern Liberalism.
The seminal thought of Pelagius survives today not as a trace or tangential influence but is pervasive in the modern church. Indeed, the modern church is held captive by it.
What was the core issue between Augustine and Pelagius? The heart of the debate centered on the doctrine of original sin, particularly with respect to the question of the extent to which the will of fallen man is "free." Adolph Harnack said:
"There has never, perhaps, been another crisis of equal importance in church history in which the opponents have expressed the principles at issue so clearly and abstractly. The Arian dispute before the Nicene Council can alone be compared with it." (History of Agmer V/IV/3)
The controversy began when the British monk, Pelagius, opposed at Rome Augustine's famous prayer: "Grant what Thou commandest, and command what Thou dost desire." Pelagius recoiled in horror at the idea that a divine gift (grace) is necessary to perform what God commands. For Pelagius and his followers responsibility always implies ability. If man has the moral responsibility to obey the law of God, he must also have the moral ability to do it.
Harnack summarizes Pelagian thought:
"Nature, free-will, virtue and law, these strictly defined and made independent of the notion of God - were the catch-words of Pelagianism: self-acquired virtue is the supreme good which is followed by reward. Religion and morality lie in the sphere of the free spirit; they are at any moment by man's own effort."
The difference between Pelagianism and Semi-Pelagianism is more a difference of degree than of kind. To be sure, on the surface there seems like there is a huge difference between the two, particularly with respect to original sin and to the sinner's dependence upon grace.
Pelagius categorically denied the doctrine of original sin, arguing that Adam's sin affected Adam alone and that infants at birth are in the same state as Adam was before the Fall. Pelagius also argued that though grace may facilitate the achieving of righteousness, it is not necessary to that end. Also, he insisted that the constituent nature of humanity is not convertible; it is indestructively good.
Over against Pelagius, Semi-Pelagianism does have a doctrine of original sin whereby mankind is considered fallen. Consequently grace not only facilitates virtue, it is necessary for virtue to ensue. Man's nature can be changed and has been changed by the Fall.
However, in Semi-Pelagianism there remains a moral ability within man that is unaffected by the Fall. We call this an "island of righteousness" by which the fallen sinner still has the inherent ability to incline or move himself to cooperate with God's grace. Grace is necessary but not necessarily effective. Its effect always depends upon the sinner's cooperation with it by virtue of the exercise of the will.
It is not by accident that Martin Luther considered "The Bondage of the Will" to be his most important book. He saw in Erasmus a man who, despite his protests to the contrary, was a Pelagian in Catholic clothing. Luther saw that lurking beneath the controversy of merit and grace, and faith and works was the issue of to what degree the human will is enslaved by sin and to what degree we are dependent upon grace for our liberation. Luther argued from the Bible that the flesh profits nothing and that this "nothing" is not a little "something."
Augustine's view of the Fall was opposed to both Pelagianism and Semi-Pelagianism. He said that mankind is a massa peccati, a "mess of sin," incapable of raising itself from spiritual death. For Augustine man can no more move or incline himself to God than an empty glass can fill itself. For Augustine the initial work of divine grace by which the soul is liberated from the bondage of sin is sovereign and operative.
To be sure we cooperate with this grace, but only after the initial divine work of liberation. Augustine did not deny that fallen man still has a will and that the will is capable of making choices. He argued that fallen man still has a free will (liberium arbitrium) but has lost his moral liberty (libertas).
The state of original sin leaves us in the wretched condition of being unable to refrain from sinning. We still are able to choose what we desire, but our desires remain chained by our evil impulses. He argued that the freedom that remains in the will always leads to sin. Thus in the flesh we are free only to sin, a hollow freedom indeed. It is freedom without liberty, a real moral bondage.
True liberty can only come from without, from the work of God on the soul. Therefore we are not only partly dependent upon grace for our conversion but totally dependent upon grace.
Modern Evangelicalism sprung from the Reformation whose roots were planted by Augustine. But today the Reformational and Augustinian view of grace is all but eclipsed in Evangelicalism. Where Luther triumphed in the sixteenth century, subsequent generations gave the nod to Erasmus.
Modern evangelicals repudiate unvarnished Pelagianism and frequently Semi-Pelagianism as well. It is insisted that grace is necessary for salvation and that man is fallen. The will is acknowledged to be severely weakened even to the point of being "99 percent" dependent upon grace for its liberation. But that one percent of unaffected moral ability or spiritual power which becomes the decisive difference between salvation and perdition is the link that preserves the chain to Pelagius. We have not broken free from the Pelagian captivity of the church.
That one percent is the "little something" Luther sought to demolish because it removes the sola from sola gratia and ultimately the sola from sola fide. The irony may be that though modern Evangelicalism loudly and repeatedly denounces Humanism as the mortal enemy of Christianity, it entertains a Humanistic view of man and of the will at its deepest core.
We need an Augustine or a Luther to speak to us anew lest the light of God's grace be not only over-shadowed but be obliterated in our time.
Saturday, January 28, 2006
Reference Library
TEXAS LONGHORNS: A SYMBOL OF WESTERN HERITAGE AND BREED OF ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT TRAITS FOR THE BEEF CATTLE INDUSTRYby Dr. Bob Kropp, Oklahoma State University Chairman, Breed Advisory Committee -- Texas Longhorn Breeders' Association of America
CALVING EASE - the natural result of calving difficulties causing the early and swift demise of those cows that did not give birth easily and without undue problems.
DISEASE AND PARASITE RESISTANCE - a subtle but important attribute. Susceptibility to disease and parasites soon depleted that type of cattle.
BROWSE UTILIZATION - the sometimes harsh environment, that was the nursery of evolution, demanded that the cattle do well in times of drought as well as in times of plenty.
HARDINESS - a trait directly connected to "survival of the fittest.
FERTILITY - a genetic trait dominant in evolution of a species. A species is fertile, or it dies out.
The cattle industry began to appreciate the value of the genetic traits possessed by the Texas Longhorn and making use of them through the use of F-1 or one-half Texas Longhorn brood cows. This combination, when bred to a bull of yet another breed, produces a three-way cross calf that is a complete product. Jim Hutchinson of Berryville, Virginia is a dedicated Texas Longhorn breeder as well as a commercial cattleman involved in a fully integrated USDA - certified natural beef company (Shenandoah Natural Beef, Inc.) which breeds, backgrounds, feeds, processes and sells retail/wholesale natural beef to supermarkets, restaurants and direct to the consumer. His main concern is not the color of the hide or the length of the horns, but how much it costs to maintain a cow, raise a calf to weaning, how fast the calf will gain on pasture and how well the calf feeds, yields when slaughtered and whether the final product-BEEF- is tender, juicy and flavorful! The goal of most Texas Longhorn breeders that would like to see the Texas Longhorn cattle have a greater impact on the future of the beef cattle industry is simply to maximize the positive influence of Texas Longhorns on the beef industry and to do so in a way which increases the value of registered Texas Longhorn cattle. Given the demographics of the beef industry and the positive and negative characteristics of the Texas Longhorn breed, it appears that the Texas Longhorns can have their greatest impact on the American beef cattle industry by using them in commercial crossbreeding programs. Today's consumer is demanding a leaner, highly trimmed, but palatable portion of beef. Packers, feeders and commercial cow-calf producers are now focusing more consumer needs and desires as far as carcass specifications are concerned. By utilizing the desirable genetic characteristics of Texas Longhorn cattle, Mr. Hutchinson has been able to produce a commercial cow that will wean 50% of her body weight in calf and the calf will grade Choice with a minimal amount of external fat deposition. Animal scientists across the country as well as successful commercial cow-calf producers have long been proponents of crossbreeding to increase the efficiency of beef production. He has found that a basic English bred cow bred to a well-muscled Texas Longhorn bull will produce an excellent F-i replacement female. Other outstanding results have been found by crossing Salers, Gelbvieh and Simmental to Longhorn cattle. Regardless, the mating of a F-1 Texas Longhorn crossbred female to a bull of a third breed to produce a three way cross feeder steer has been ideal for his operation. Data from the USDA Meat Animal Research Center, Texas A&M and other Texas Longhorn breeders have shown that Fl and three way cross steers possessing Longhorn blood have performed well, while producing well marbled carcasses with little fat trim. The Hudson Ranch near Manhattan, Kansas is one of the largest and best-known commercial cattle operations in eastern Kansas. Covering over 10,000 acres of some of America's best agricultural land, the Hudson Ranch carries 1000 cow/calf pairs and summers over 500 yearling annually. In 1978, the owners of the ranch went in search for bulls to breed their first calf heifers. After researching several breeds, the decision was made to use Texas Longhorns primarily because of their calving ease. The manager of the ranch, Dave McKinney, was against the idea. He commented, "I thought that we could get the same calving ease with a small Angus or something. When they started keeping the Fl heifers, I really had a negative attitude. But after they had their third calf, I began to see that these cows were doing a good job. They had even udders; the calves were kind of even coming off of them, and they provided a real rich milk that produced a real nice looking set of calves. Dave is a graduate of Kansas State University in Animal Science and Industry with an emphasis in Beef Production. Shortly after taking over as manager, Dave put some of his schooling to use by doing a study. The Hudson Ranch herd is divided into three separate groups. They had some primarily Angus, Angus/Hereford cross cows that they put with Charolais bulls. The second herd consisted of British/Charolais cows that they placed with Simmental bulls. The third herd was a herd of Texas Longhorn cross cows that were placed with Simmental bulls.The study was conducted over a three-year period. " In each group we had a control group so that they were all pretty much treated the same," Dave explained."We weighed the calves at birth, at 45 days, at 100 days, and at 210 days," he continued. "The Longhorn calves at the end of 45 days were always the lightest calves. That's about what you would expect. But, what we found was that at the end of 210 days, they had actually caught up." In each of the three years, the calves out of the Longhorn cross cows had the highest average daily gain (ADG).Other genetic traits that the Texas Longhorn seems to throw into a crossbreeding program were high fertility and continued calving ease. In each of the six years that McKinney has been managing the ranch, "the Longhorn cows have had the highest conception rate. The other two herds will run 94% to 95% which is pretty good. But, the Longhorn cattle will run 96% or better. They just breed back better."And when it comes to calving ease, "even with the half Longhorn cow bred to a Simmental bull, we just don't have any problem. They'll have 70 to 75 pound calves even out of bulls whose records predict 100 lb. calves.""In fact," he announced, "we get a little reckless with the bulls we put on the Longhorns. If we have a bull that has a history of problems or maybe he has a record of 110 lb. calves, we just make sure he goes with our Longhorn cows."" The bonus is not having to be out there baby sitting them during calving season!" he said with relief.So what's the future of the Texas Longhorn on the Hudson Ranch? "Over the next year or so I expect it will expand to about a third of the herd McKinney predicted. We've got about 600 head of yearlings bred to the Longhorn bulls this year, and I imagine we'll have a good number to pick from for replacements." Has Dave's attitude changed about the Texas Longhorn? At a sale held in Manhattan this past spring he was overheard to say, "When we first started using the Longhorns, we kept the calves in the back and sent them to market separate from our other cattle. After working with them for the past few years, now we' re bragging about them!" What commercial cattlemen would pass up the opportunity to own a small to moderate sized cow (900-1100 lb) which eats less, lives longer is extremely fertile and produces over 50% of her body weight in a calf that grades Choice with minimal external fatness. The Texas Longhorn has become a symbol of survival. It evolved, prospered, was brought to the brink of extinction, recovered, and is now on the way of again becoming one of the world's most useful breeds of cattle.
Thursday, January 26, 2006
Tuesday, January 24, 2006
Friday, January 20, 2006
One of the teachers of the law came and heard them debating. Noticing that Jesus had given them a good answer, he asked him, "Of all the commandments, which is the most important?"
"The most important one," answered Jesus, "is this: 'Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one. Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.' The second is this: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.' There is no commandment greater than these."
Thursday, January 19, 2006
Tuesday, January 17, 2006
Monday, January 16, 2006
It translates into:
$8,896.66 a year,
$741.38 a month, or
$171.08 a week.
That's a mere $24.24 a day!
Just over a dollar an hour.
Still, you might think the best financial advice is don't have children if you want to be "rich." Actually, it is just the opposite.
What do you get for your $160,140?
Naming rights. First, middle, and last!
Glimpses of God every day.
Giggles under the covers every night.
More love than your heart can hold.
Butterfly kisses and Velcro hugs.
Endless wonder over rocks, ants, clouds, and warm cookies.
A hand to hold, usually covered with jelly or chocolate.
A partner for blowing bubbles, flying kites
Someone to laugh yourself silly with, no matter what the boss said or how your stocks performed that day.
For $160,140, you never have to grow up.
You get to:
finger-paint,
carve pumpkins,
play hide-and-seek,
catch lightning bugs, and
never stop believing in Santa Claus.
You have an excuse to:
keep reading the Adventures of Piglet and Pooh,
watching Saturday morning cartoons,
going to Disney movies, and
wishing on stars.
You get to frame rainbows, hearts, and flowers under refrigerator magnets and collect spray painted noodle wreaths for Christmas, hand prints set in clay for Mother's Day, and cards with backward letters for Father's Day.
For $160,140, there is no greater bang for your buck.
You get to be a hero just for:
retrieving a Frisbee off the garage roof,
taking the training wheels off a bike,
removing a splinter,
filling a wading pool,
coaxing a wad of gum out of bangs,
and coaching a baseball team that never wins but always gets treated to ice cream regardless.
You get a front row seat to history to witness the:
first step,
first word,
first date, and
first time behind the wheel.
You get to be immortal. You get another branch added to your family tree, and if you're lucky, a long list of limbs in your obituary called grandchildren and great grandchildren. You get an education in psychology, nursing, criminal justice, communications, and human sexuality that no college can match. In the eyes of a child, you rank right up there under God. You have all the power to heal a boo-boo, scare away the monsters under the bed, patch a broken heart, police a slumber party, ground them forever, and love them without limits.
So . . one day they will, like you, love without counting the cost.
That is quite a deal for the price!
Love & enjoy your children & grandchildren!
Sunday, January 08, 2006
I will be out of town for a few days and plan to resume blogging (God willing) this coming weekend. Hasta luego!
Thursday, January 05, 2006
Wow, how about those Longhorns! Congratulations to the University of Texas Longhorns. Was that an awesome Rose Bowl performance by Vince Young, or what? I don't think I have ever seen (or will ever see) a more thrilling game. By the way, methinks the Heisman award went to the wrong person this year. To my mind, Vince Young is clearly the best football player in the country. What a player and what a game. Hook 'em!