Friday, June 13, 2008

 
Why I Left the Presbyterian Church (USA)

For many years, I was called to remain in the Presbyterian Church (USA) as a voice for reformation and renewal. To that end, my wife and I served as national representatives for a wonderful renewal ministry called Presbyterian Reformed Ministries International. We coordinated and participated in many church renewal events across the country and were blessed to be part of God’s transforming work at the congregational level.

Additionally, I actively supported and aligned myself with other Presbyterian renewal ministries and movements, including Presbyterians for Renewal, The Confessing Church Movement, New Wineskins, and Presbyterians Pro Life. I longed to see my soul-sick denomination return to its biblical and historical roots.

However, after serving for some twenty years in the PC (USA), during which I watched it stray dangerously far from the authority of Holy Scripture and the centrality of Jesus Christ, I concluded that God had removed His hand of blessing from much of mainline denominationalism. A friend of mine put it bluntly years ago when he said that a fitting label for the PC (USA) was the biblical name Ichabod (meaning “no glory”). Over the years, as I surveyed the spiritual wreckage that is the PC (USA), I concluded that the glory had departed.

I did not share the belief system and worldview that prevail in much of the Presbyterian Church (USA), especially at the leadership level. I was—and continue to be—wholeheartedly committed to the historic, biblical faith, and found myself frequently at odds with my former denomination on many, many issues, including:

*The 1993 Re-imagining Conference. Supported largely by the Presbyterian Church (USA) and other mainline denominations, the conference promoted a radical feminist agenda that included prayers to the goddess Sophia and the substitution of a profane milk and honey ritual for the Lord’s Supper. One conference speaker declared that Mary and Martha in the Bible were not actual sisters but lesbian lovers, while another speaker led participants in a prayer to “earth maker Mauna, our creator.” Delores Williams, a “womanist” theology professor and Re-imagining conference speaker, said, “I don’t think we need a theory of the atonement at all…. I don’t think we need folks hanging on crosses and blood dripping and weird stuff.”

*Denominational pronouncements that support terrorist, Marxist, and radical leftist causes, while often vilifying the United States and Israel.

*Denominational support of the slaughter of innocents (abortion on demand) in the name of choice.

*The failure to discipline radical gay-rights advocates/renegade ministers who are performing same-sex unions.

*The PUP report and its provision for “local option.”

*The replacement of traditional language for the Triune God (i.e., “Father, Son, and Holy Spirit”) with “Mother, Child, Womb” and other designations. This is advocated in a report titled “The Trinity: God’s Love Overflowing” that the 217th General Assembly voted to receive in 2006.

*Mainline clergy, seminary professors, and students who deny the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ, His virgin birth, substitutionary atonement, salvation through Christ alone, the God-breathed nature and authority of Holy Scripture, etc. Many of these PC (USA) leaders and future leaders also embrace and promote Marxism, liberation theology, homosexuality, radical feminism, universalism, and seemingly every belief except biblical Christianity. Historic Reformed theology receives comparatively little attention in mainline Presbyterian Church (USA) seminaries.

*Spiritually barren denominational publications that say very little about personal transformation via the living Christ. I think also of the countless hours I spent engaged in human-centered meetings and busywork that were void of the manifest presence and power of the Holy Spirit.

*The refusal of the PC (USA) to take seriously the loss of 2 million of its members since 1965 and a yearly hemorrhage of church membership—projections point to yet another year of huge losses.

*The draconian measures denominational bureaucrats are employing to keep churches from leaving the PC (USA) with their property; and the vilifying of Christ-honoring, Bible-based denominations such as the Evangelical Presbyterian Church and New Wineskins Association of Churches, with which many PC (USA) congregations are aligning.

I had no qualms about leaving the Presbyterian Church (USA): for in truth, I did not leave the denomination … the denomination left me and many of us years ago. While I acknowledge that there are fine and godly people who remain in my former denomination, I reached a point where I could not be true to my conscience and my God by remaining onboard a rudderless and sinking denominational ship that had been commandeered by spiritual pirates … a ship that continues to be blown here and there by the fickle winds of prevailing culture, rather than by the wind of the Holy Spirit. I cannot--and will not--raise my children in that setting.

To be sure, I am excited by the prospect of setting sail on a sturdy vessel that has as its Captain the Lord Jesus Christ. I am eager to serve the Lord in a Christ-exalting, Bible-based Presbyterian denomination.

Tragically, the designation “Christ-exalting” and “Bible-based” no longer describes the Presbyterian Church (USA). I believe my friend was right: the more fitting moniker for culturally-bound denominations such as the PC (USA) is Ichabod.

Comments:
As you set sail, I will pray for you and your "crew" that God sends you fair winds and following seas.

Mac
 
Thanks, Mac! I am looking forward to some calmer winds and seas!
 
Deutero q-

I just wanted to anonymously confirm your statements about PC(USA) seminaries educating their students in universalism, radical feminisim, and anti-atonement theology. I attended a PC(USA) semianry for a year in an M.Div. program. Instead of spending time studying reformed theology we were given textbooks that celebrated the goddess Sophia. In my biblical exegesis courses we were taught to be skeptical of its authority. Instead, redaction criticism and incongruities regarding synoptic parallelism were celebrated...I believe this is called a hermeneutics of suspicion.

With a sick feeling in my stomach, I left the seminary and finished another master's program at another graduate school.

I have long been troubled about the PC(USA)'s stance on Israel; your comments on the recent movements by the GA for the three traditions to celebrate religious holidays together is simply ludicrous. The older I get the more I think it all boils down to the authority of Jesus Christ and atonement. If one denies the crucifixtion and resurrection then I suppose universalism might be truly possible. But then doesn't that make the New Testament "in toto" a complete fraud?

My family and I chose to leave a local PC(USA) church and joined a PCA church. While church-life is never perfect, we're happy that the pastor's honor God's word and celebrate his sovereignity.

I wish you the best in your journey. God's peace and blessings to you.
 
As someone who left the PCUSA in 1979 for the same reasons you post today, my question is this: Where now? I live in a small town with few options. Baptist doesn't fit, and the nondenoms are often without accountability. Is New Wineskins or EPC going to begin moving into more rural areas?

Still Looking for a Home
 
Anon-

Good question. I'm not sure what part of the country you're in. I have been pleasantly surprised to learn that there are some Baptist churches around that are of Reformed theological persuasion(check out www.founders.org).

But depnding how far you are from a mid-sized or larger city, you may have to drive to find a solidly Reformed congregation.

On the other hand, perhaps the Lord might lead you to start a home church that is grounded in Reformed (i.e., biblical) theology!
 
Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Web Counter
1800Flowers.com